I Prayed have prayed
Father God, let our nation’s leaders be granted wisdom, knowledge, and understanding.

Father God, let our nation’s leaders be granted wisdom, knowledge, and understanding.

Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) officers used fake online personas to monitor social media users, and, at one point, considered employing tools that critics say would lead to law enforcement profiling innocent people, according to recently revealed government documents.


The documents, released by the Brennan Center for Justice following an open-records request with the LAPD, have raised concerns among critics that law enforcement’s online surveillance operations harm freedom of expression and encourage profiling. . . .

The Brennan Center released an initial set of documents in September, showing that LAPD officers use fake social media accounts to monitor online activity. The FBI and other federal intelligence agencies are restricted from using such tactics under a Reagan-era executive order that requires agents to reveal their identities when participating in private organizations. . . .

The media guide requires LAPD officers to receive permission from a commanding officer but imposes few other rules for how such activity should be conducted.

“Officers need not document the searches they conduct, their purpose, or the justification. They are not required to seek supervisory approval, and the guide offers no standards for the types of cases that warrant social media surveillance,” the Brennan Center stated.

“While officers are instructed not to conduct social media surveillance for personal, illicit, or illegal purposes, they seem otherwise to have complete discretion over whom to surveil, how broadly to track their online activity, and how long to monitor them.” . . .

“While the legitimacy of such policies may be up to the LAPD, officers must abide by Facebook’s policies when creating accounts on our services,” Facebook attorney Roy Austin told LAPD Chief Michel Moore. “The Police Department should cease all activities on Facebook that involve the use of fake accounts, impersonation of others, and collection of data for surveillance purposes.”

Last week, the Brennan Center released another round of records, this one detailing the LAPD correspondence with the tech firm Voyager Labs. According to the records, Voyager marketed a product it claimed can assess the strength of people’s ideological beliefs and the level of “passion” they feel by looking at their social media activity and connections. . . .

The documents show that some LAPD personnel expressed concerns about using Voyager. One email from a Voyager official states that the LAPD rejected a program that would notify officers of daily, weekly, or monthly of any new content or friend changes on a profile.

The LAPD rejected this program because “it’s very close to active monitoring,” the email reads.

While the LAPD apparently doesn’t use Voyager’s program, the Brennan Center nevertheless explained why doing so would be detrimental to civil liberties. . . .

Levinson-Waldman and Dwyer further criticized Voyager for focusing on Muslim terrorism while ignoring threats from the far right. The Brennan Center also opposes using similar surveillance tactics against right-wingers.

Voyager disputes the Brennan Center’s characterization of its products and services. . . .

Voyager stated that it follows the laws of the jurisdictions in which it does business and has confidence that its clients are also law-abiding.

“The software is agnostic as to which data its customer decides to upload to the system and from which databases that it decides to use,” it stated. “However, Voyager itself neither provides nor builds databases of its own, nor does it supply any Voyager personnel to run its software. These are our clients’ responsibilities and decisions, in which Voyager has no involvement at all.” . . .

What do you think about the LAPD using fake social media accounts to spy on users?

(Excerpt from The Epoch Times. Photo by Getty Images.)

Comments (1) Print


Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

December 2, 2021

I could be reading this wrong, but it seems like the article is using a sensational word like spy to communicate that LAPD is simply conducting online undercover operations. This is how they catch pedophiles and other bad guys. This is how law enforcement in multiple states have prevented countless school shootings and other terrible things. The article seems to have a misleading title. There’s a big difference between spying in a creepy way and trained professionals assessing a threat undercover for the purpose of neutralizing the threat. There is an extensive training officers undergo to engage undercover at this level. The Brennan Law Canter for Justice that is bringing these concerns is also fighting FOR abortion rights. The other agendas of the source of the accusations communicates loud and clear. I know many LAPD officers (undercover, patrol and leadership) and they use their authority with extreme excellence and integrity under a tremendous amount of terrible treatment that no one will ever truly know and an oppressive pressure in LA that is crushing without Jesus. I’d rather have them assessing threats online and neutralizing them than have more misleading accusations that limit the good guys. Are there exceptions to the motivations of an officer here and there…sure…but the overall intent of each undercover officer online is to keep your children and theirs along with all our loved ones safer ❤️


Partner with Us

Intercessors for America is the trusted resource for millions of people across the United States committed to praying for our nation. If you have benefited from IFA's resources and community, please consider joining us as a monthly support partner. As a 501(c)3 organization, it's through your support that all this possible.

Dave Kubal
IFA President
Become a Monthly Partner


Click below to share this with others

Login to Join the Conversation

Create an IFA account or login to comment, pray and interact with our community.