January 26, 2021 | From The Gateway Pundit
This video of the best overviews of what has happened with the election. A conservative law professor responds to his College President’s letter. But it affects all of us as it’s the talking points against people who want fair elections. He admits he was never-Trumper in 2016 but voted for Trump in 2020. He’s calm, practical, and gives a great argument. In another video he says he has hope and is a person of faith. He’s been on Fox/Tucker a bit lately too. He proves basically that Antifa broke into the Capitol with Maga people following. Let us know what you think. Leave a comment.
Peter Navarro, Member Of Trump’s Team, Just Dropped A Massive Report On Election Fraud That Proves Trump Won
Volume 3 of the Navarro Report is designed to serve as a capstone to what has been a comprehensive analysis of the question: Was the 2020 presidential election stolen from Donald J. Trump? In this report, we provide the most up-to-date statistical “receipts” with respect to the potential number of illegal votes in each battleground state. Read the FULL REPORT HERE.
Law Professor Davide K. Clements released a rebuttal video recently refuting that there was no evidence of election fraud in the 2020 election.
As The Gateway Pundit has reported for months now the fraud was extensive and historic.
Professor Clements’s video already has 121,000 views. . . .
Editor’s Note: Read part of the transcript below:
A business law professor at New Mexico State University (NMSU) said that anyone who proposes there “is no evidence” for massive election fraud in November’s presidential election doesn’t know what they are talking about.
Professor David K. Clements released a provocative video in response to a letter sent to the entire faculty of NMSU from Dr. John Floros, the university’s president. Clements described the letter as “regurgitating” the narrative “in the media” regarding the election and the January 6 violence at the U.S. Capital.
While broadly addressing many issues on these topics, he was very specific with regards to his own personal investigation into the election fraud question.
For those who believe “there is no evidence, you don’t know what you are talking about,” he said. “I’ve reviewed hours upon hours of public hearings. I have read almost all of the lawsuits that are out there. Most of them were dismissed on legal process grounds.”
These suits, he said, were dismissed due to a legal lack of standing. “The general argument” that was presented in these cases, he said, “was that because this was a general harm,” then “you have no standing because your harm has to be particular. It’s not because there isn’t evidence. There is evidence,” the professor emphasized.
“In fact, I’m in possession of 574 pages of sworn affidavits, forensic reports, all of which would make its way in a court of law under the rules of evidence in a federal or state court. The fact that the evidence has not been heard here by these courts” should not be conflated into “this idea that there is no evidence,” Clements argued.
(Excerpt from The Gateway Pundit. Photo Credit: Getty Images.)