Why should NASA be controlling greenhouse gas emissions, and why should they be using taxpayer money to do it?

From Fox News. Sen. Ted. Cruz, R-Texas, led a coalition of 12 other Republicans on Monday, writing to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to express concern over a recent climate rule that could impact the agency’s mission.

View Comments (9)

Get prayer updates from IFA.

In the letter, Cruz — the ranking member of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee — and all other committee Republicans demanded that NASA Administrator Bill Nelson abandon the rule which was proposed in November and requires federal contractors to disclose greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions data. The 13 GOP lawmakers said the regulation was not based in science and would lead to political favoritism.

“Congress never granted NASA or the other partnering agencies the statutory authority to set the GHG emission standards for themselves or their contractors,” Cruz and the other committee Republicans wrote.  …

The letter argued the “highly politicized regulation” would divert the agency’s attention away from its stated mission to “explore the unknown in air and space, innovate for the benefit of humanity, and inspire the world through discovery.”

On Nov. 14, NASA issued the proposed rule alongside the Department of Defense (DOD) and General Services Administration (GSA). In addition to the GHG disclosure requirement, federal contractors would be required to disclose climate-related financial “risk” and to establish “science-based” GHG emission reduction targets. …

“The regulation is estimated to increase total costs among federal agencies and contractors by almost $4 billion,” the Republicans’ letter to Nelson continued. …

“The costs to individual contractors, many of which are small businesses, would equal hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars upfront and annually thereafter. Smaller firms with limited streams of resources compared to larger companies may have to either exit the government contracting market or consolidate with other entities.”

Cruz and the other Republicans added that the rule would decrease competition among contractors which they warned is “a major problem already facing federal contracting.”

The lawmakers also expressed concern that the rule defers judgment on standards to the Science-Based Targets Initiative, an international climate-focused organization. They said the group has yet to publish new GHG emission guidance for the fossil fuel and mining industries, “making it impossible to be in compliance.” …

What do you think of NASA’s rule? Share your thoughts and prayers below.

(Excerpt from Fox News. Photo Credit: Getty Images)