I Prayed have prayed
Lord, we pray for wisdom for judicial branch leaders as they evaluate ways to ensure freedom of speech for all in this digital era.

Analysis. Battles over Big Tech censorship could be entering a significant new phase as legal battles are beginning to draw commentary from leaders at the highest levels of judicial power. And one technical policy area that could soon find its way into primetime debate centers on the concept of “common carriers.”

Post a prayer for your state!


Now, eyes across the country have good reason to be on the U.S. Supreme Court at this moment. Like many IFA readers I am very hopeful for the overturn of the infamous Roe v. Wade ruling. But I also took note in recent weeks of another less publicized announcement out of the high court in which a slim majority of the justices temporarily halted a state social media law. And even more interesting to me were the justices who openly dissented.

At issue is a Texas law (known as HB20) aimed at preventing viewpoint censorship on major social media platforms with at least 50 million active users. The law also mandates appeals procedures for content moderation decisions and new transparency rules for the platforms. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott signed HB20 into law last September, but state authorities were barred from enforcing it in December by a federal district court judge. Then the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit lifted that injunction in mid-May, leading tech-friendly groups to bring their cause to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Responding to the Big Tech appeal for a reinstated injunction, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton argued the applicants were wrong to assert a First Amendment free speech “right to refuse service to their customers based on the viewpoints those customers profess.”

“This Court has never recognized such a right, and it should not do so now to vacate a stay,” said Paxton.

Paxton agreed that the government generally cannot interfere with or compel speech. However, he said HB20 simply forbids the tech giants from closing their platforms from speech they don’t like. And to do this Texas has determined that these major platforms are “common carriers.”

In order to keep essential public pathways open, common carriers, such as dominant transportation or telephone companies, can be successfully subjected to more regulations including nondiscrimination rules. Paxton asserted that the social media giants are “twenty-first century descendants of telegraph and telephone companies,” and they can’t hide behind claims of “editorial discretion” (which he suggested they seem to change their tune on whenever faced with challenges to their liability shield under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act).

As I noted, Texas lost this round. But narrowly and not completely. The willingness of 5 justices to re-impose the injunction halts HB20’s enforcement but does not stop the ongoing litigation over its merits before lower courts. None of those justices made any further remarks, so it is unknown how they might rule should a case on the substance of HB20 come before them.

Most of the dissenting justices were not silent, however. True, Justice Elena Kagan — typically on the court’s liberal wing — interestingly opposed the renewed injunction without any further comment. But Justice Samuel Alito authored a 6-page dissent that was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch.

“The law before us is novel, as are applicants’ business models,” said Alito.

He recounted many of the points made by Texas, including references to its common carriage arguments. He also in a footnote recalled the state’s apparent push for skepticism about the social media platforms’ selectively used claim of “editorial discretion.”

“It is not at all obvious how our existing precedents, which predate the age of the internet, should apply to large social media companies,” he said.

While stating clearly that he has not come to final conclusions about the “novel legal questions” raised in this case, Alito and his colleagues didn’t think the time was ripe for intervention against the law. In fact, they saw the injunction as an overreach against state sovereignty.

“Texas should not be required to seek pre-clearance from the federal courts before its laws go into effect,” Alito declared.

For now the litigation on HB20 will continue. Meanwhile, the common carrier debate is becoming even more complicated after two other courts diverged on the topic during the same week. On May 23 a federal appeals court ruled a Florida law against social media viewpoint discrimination resting on similar presumptions ran afoul of the First Amendment. But the next day an Ohio court ruled the state could reasonably make a case that Google’s ubiquitous search engine is a common carrier.

Substantiated claims of viewpoint censorship on social media platforms are not disappearing. And if Big Tech advocates prefer battles versus remedies for this problem, these debates over common carriage and Section 230 are likely to continue escalating. In that case, our leaders will need your prayers for much wisdom to get this important area of law right.

How are you praying about content censorship in media?

Aaron Mercer is a Contributing Writer with two decades of experience in Washington, D.C.s public policy arena.

Comments (7) Print


Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Jeannie Huppert
June 14, 2022

“State social media law”??? I’ve been saying for a while: “state radio; state newspaper” were exactly what hitler had . . . . probably mao & others as well. YES I PRAY: ABOUT ALL YOU SEND ME; & I PRAY OVER ALL MY EMAILS: ALL NAMES DISCUSSED, ALL SENDERS, ALL SITUATIONS, ETC. No wonder why Apostle Paul said “pray WITHOUT ceasing!” ESPECIALLY today! God Bless you abundantly for all you do! I appreciate you all very much!

Santos Garcia Jr.
June 11, 2022

The corruption and collusion continues to be exposed. We ARE headed for the Greatest Spiritual Awakening in the History of Mankind! Let us ALL continue in fervent Prayer with Fasting as we recognize that the next six months are pivotal to accomplishing for the LORD desires in our midst… All to His Glory, in the Name of our LORD & Saviour Jesus Christ- AMEN!


Barbara Janicki
June 11, 2022

If our speech is not free, then neither can our country remain free. It is very telling that lies are promoted while truth is censored and silenced – using claims of misinformation and such. Jesus words are true, “Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.” All we have to do is to look at other countries suffering under tyrannical government control, to realize free speech is the first thing to go on the road to being taken over by a repressive regime. Now is the time to protect and preserve and take back our freedoms before it is too late. http://www.mtothe5th.wordpress.com

Virginia Turner
June 11, 2022

Airways must be controlled. We have
Horrendous mouths today.
Christians can’t speak

Linda k Rice
June 11, 2022

The first amendment begins “Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech” and Congress has not made a law regarding that. But private companies are not Congress. For that matter, newspapers, news agencies etc are allowed to be biased. Choosing what you listen to is wisdom. If you can’t speak freely on Facebook, find another platform.

Laura Love-Wymore
June 10, 2022

This is a war over words, a spiritual war over who gets to speak and who gets to be covered up. It’s a war over communication. It’s a battle over truth. It’s an issue that only Holy Spirit can correct. It reminds me of the brothers of young David, who did anything to cover up the fact that they had a brother who was powerful in spirit. They lied, they tried to endanger his life, and tried to do him in out of jealosy. The brothers tried to prevent David from achieving anything.
In the flesh, people are embattled in a war of words. I’m aware that the leftist belief is that all information from the right is dangerous. On the right, we are like David in the pit. There are deep seated belief systems at work. It is them vs us. It is “they are at fault, not us”. This battle is leading to death threats, riots, and murder attempts. Communication is lost. The spirits who are stirring up communication problems are stealing truth and attacking the entire human race. In the spirit, it feels violent. This has crossed over from fleshly concern into a case for Spiritual warfare. We may consider Mathew 12:11 and present violent demands to the spiritual forces of deception, that truth will prevail in the near months, ON earth as it is in Heaven.
I am taking the issue seriously in the Spirit, proclaiming the Lordship of Jesus Christ, while declaring the truth of the WORD of God. I am praying in tongues, laying this problem of the war of words “lies versus truth” before the King of Kings.


Partner with Us

Intercessors for America is the trusted resource for millions of people across the United States committed to praying for our nation. If you have benefited from IFA's resources and community, please consider joining us as a monthly support partner. As a 501(c)3 organization, it's through your support that all this possible.

Dave Kubal
IFA President
Become a Monthly Partner


Click below to share this with others

Log in to Join the Conversation

Log in to your IFA account to start a discussion, comment, pray, and interact with our community.