Updates on the Durham Investigation
What is a Human?
Encouragement: The Power of the Sonflower
IFAās Dave Kubal on the Power of Prayer
Evidence Demonstrates Gmail Political Bias
Updates on the Durham Investigation
This past Friday, new information further incriminating Clinton campaign attorney Michael Sussmann came to light.
From The Federalist. New court filings in a Spygate case solve some long-running mysteries and hint at serious developments.
Late Friday, three new memoranda and a handful of exhibits hit theĀ docket in Special Counsel John Durhamās criminal case against former Hillary Clinton campaign attorney Michael Sussmann. The filings analyzed about a dozen tedious issues concerning what evidence prosecutors may use at trial to prove Sussmann broke the law by lying to then-FBI General Counsel James Baker when he showed Baker information that supposedly indicated Donald Trump had a secret communications channel with the Russia-based Alfa Bank.
The evidentiary issues and the courtās resolution of them will prove vital when the trial begins next month….
The Mystery of the Appearing Text SolvedāSort Of
Two weeks ago, when the wave of pre-trial evidentiary filings began, the special counselās office revealed for the first time that the day before Sussmann met with Baker, Sussmann sent this text to Bakerās personal cellphone: āJimāitās Michael Sussmann. I have something time-sensitive (and sensitive) I need to discuss. Do you have availability for a short meeting tomorrow? Iām coming on my ownānot on behalf of a client or companyāwant to help the Bureau. Thanks.ā
The existence of this text is huge because, as the special counsel stressed in its filing, it shows that āthe night before the defendant met with the General Counsel, the defendant conveyed the same lie in writing….ā
The revelation of the text message, however, also raised numerous questions. From the court filings in the Sussmann case and comments made by Sussmannās attorneys, it appeared neither side knew of the text message at the time the indictment dropped. Why not? And why was the text just now becoming known?
On Friday we learned the answers to these questions, in part.
āOn March 4, 2022, Mr. Baker apparently retrieved from his personal phone copies of text messages that he had sent and received with Mr. Sussmann between 2016 and 2020,ā Sussmannās attorneys wrote in their brief. Sussmann further claimed the special counsel had said that āthe text messages had been stored on the cloud and Mr. Baker had not thought to produce them earlier.ā
So Durham did not know of this text message at the time of the indictment, nor for five more months. But it was Baker, not the Department of Justiceās Office of Inspector General, who provided the text….
Yes, the Executive Office of the President Spying Was About Trump
The second blockbuster revelation from Fridayās filings concerned the Russia Yota cell phone hoax Sussmann fed to the CIA during a February 9, 2017, meeting, allegedly on behalf of Joffe.
Approximately two months ago, the special counsel revealed how, as part of this hoax, Trumpās enemies surveilled the internet traffic at Trump Tower, his New York City apartment building, a Michigan business, and later the Executive Office of the President of the United States (EOP). Sussmann then provided that data to the CIA, telling agents there were āsuspicious lookupsā of the āinternet protocol or IP addresses affiliated with a Russian mobile phone providerā connected to the supposedly rare Russian Yota phone….
When news broke that to craft the Yota phone hoax Joffe hadĀ accessedĀ data his internet company obtained āas part of a sensitive arrangement whereby it provided DNS resolution services to the EOP,ā the corrupt media framed that explosive detail as aĀ nothingburger because the data appeared to have been collected while Barack Obama was still president….
Fridayās filings did more, however, than merely reconfirm that the EOP data Joffe exploited was collected after the election: Two exhibits filed by the special counsel revealed that the mining of the EOP data, as well as of the internet traffic at Trump Tower, Trumpās New York City apartment building, and a Michigan business, were targeted to Trumpās physical presence at those locations. This raises the further question of whether the cybersecurity experts were using geolocation technology to surveil Trumpās movements….
In addition to establishing beyond doubt that the mining of the sensitive EOP data concerned Trump, these new details suggest it was not merely the Yota cell phones and the internet at locations connected to Trump being surveilled, but Trumpās own physical movements….
Itās Tech Researcher-2, David Dagon, Who Has Immunity
The third piece of news flowing from Fridayās filings concerns the special counselās grant of immunity to Georgia Tech researcher David Dagonāand only to Dagon. āThe only witness currently immunized by the government, Researcher-2, was conferred with that status on July 28, 2021,ā Durhamās memorandum explained….
Durhamās decision to grant Dagon immunity proves intriguing for several reasons. First, unlike Researcher-1, who has been identified by his attorney as Georgia Tech researcher Manos Antonakakis, Dagon continued to work with Joffe and April Lorenzen to craft the second set ofĀ data Sussmann provided to the CIA related to the supposed Yota cellphone connection to Trump. The Sussmann indictment also alleged Dagon had drafted a white paper apparently related to the Alfa Bank allegations and that Sussmann asked Dagon to āspeak on background with members of the mediaā regarding the Alfa Bank allegation….
These details suggest Dagon holds a wealth of knowledge related to both the Alfa Bank hoax and the Yota cell phone charade, including various playersā parts in crafting the plots. More significantly, Dagon likely knows what information he and his fellow cyber researchers conveyed to Sussmann regarding the data and its weaknesses….
Dagon also has the ability to counter Sussmannās claims of ignorance about the technicalities of DNS data….
How are you praying about the Durham investigation? Share this article to keep people informed.
(Excerpt from The Federalist. Photo Credit: Getty Images)
Partner with Us
Intercessors for America is the trusted resource for millions of people across the United States committed to praying for our nation. If you have benefited from IFA's resources and community, please consider joining us as a monthly support partner. As a 501(c)3 organization, it's through your support that all this possible.


We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. Privacy Policy
Comments
GOD, YOU ARE N CONTROL, AND WE NEED TO KNOW THE TRUTH ABOUT THE PEOPLE WHO HAD THIS HOAX GO THROUGH AND THEY NEEDS TO BE EXPOSED SO WE THE PEOP
LE WOULD KNOW THE TRUTH. I PRAY FOR THIS , IN JESUS NAME, AMEN .