Court Shuts Down Censorship ‘Linchpin’
Court Shuts Down Censorship ‘Linchpin’
After a previous court decision failed to stop the true linchpin of government censorship, a new decision has corrected the error.
From The Federalist. In a bombshell ruling, the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has shut down the ānerve centerā of federal government-led speech policing, correcting aĀ critical errorĀ in its prior jurisprudence and striking a major blow for the First Amendment and against deep-state election interference.
This content is supported by your donations.
Give today.
The courtās opinion comes in the landmark free speech case in the digital era,Ā Missouri v. Biden. Before the litigation landed in appellate court, Louisiana District Judge Terry A. Doughty declared in a fitting Independence Day ruling that federal authorities from the Biden White House to the FBI and CDC had likely engaged in āthe most massive attack against free speech in United Statesā history.ā
They did so, Judge Doughty found, by cajoling and colluding with social media companies to silence wrong-thinking Americans on matters from election integrity to the origins of Covid. ā¦
The district court therefore disarmed the speech police by ordering a wide-ranging preliminary injunction, prohibiting federal authorities from coercing and coordinating with platforms to suppressĀ ever-growing categoriesĀ of disfavored speech during the pendency of the case.
This incensed the feds, who proceeded to appeal the decision to the Fifth Circuit, ironicallyĀ arguingĀ that by being barred from censoring disfavored speech by social media proxy, the government itself was being censored.
The Fifth Circuit wasnāt buying that argument. It upheld the crux of the lower courtās ruling, concurring that the administrative stateās pressuring of and partnering with social media companies to squelch Americansā speech on expressly political and subjective matters effectively rendered the platforms state actors and their ācontent moderationā efforts an assault on the First Amendment.
So the Fifth Circuit upheld a modified form of the injunction and imposed it on the federal authorities fingered by the plaintiffs ā with one glaring omission. A Department of Homeland Security sub-agency, CISA, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, would not be subject to the injunction. ā¦
CISA, as the plaintiffs ā¦ had demonstrated conclusively, was the linchpin of the fed-led censorship regime. ā¦
CISAās Censorship Tactics
CISA has served as a censorship conductor, driving regular meetings between security agencies and social media companies aimed at encouraging the platforms to combat purported mis- and disinformation. ā¦
CISA has served as a censorship āswitchboard,āĀ collecting purported misinformation from government and non-government actors in the form of tweets, YouTube videos, and even private Facebook messages, and relaying the flagged content to the platforms to squelch it.
Finally, CISAĀ has servedĀ as an architect of the broader public-private censorship regime, helping originate, consult, network, and partner with often government-linked third parties to themselves serve as First Amendment-circumventing, mass-surveillance, and mass-censorship enterprises. ā¦
In short, that social media companies flagged posts, throttled narratives, and nuked accounts en masse ā specifically around elections and interfering in those elections ā as the Louisiana District Court had found, was attributable to fed-led efforts coordinated and driven in large part by CISA.
So, for the appeals court not to subject CISA to its injunction was untenable. ā¦
The plaintiffs inĀ Missouri v. BidenĀ cried foul, petitioning the Fifth Circuit for a rehearing and a reinstatement of the injunction on CISA. Now the court has responded by fixing the latter fatal flaw.
In issuing its revised opinion, the Fifth Circuit noted that CISA had in fact likely violated the First Amendment in ācoerc[ing] or significantly encourag[ing] social-media platforms to moderate contentā beginning during the 2020 presidential election.
Therefore, the panel ruled that like the censorious Biden White House, CDC, and FBI, CISA too would be subject to a preliminary injunction prohibiting it from engaging in any action that would cause social media companies to suppress āprotected free speech.ā ā¦
Share your prayers against censorship below.
(Excerpt from The Federalist. Photo Credit: Sasun Bughdaryan on Unsplash)
Partner with Us
Intercessors for America is the trusted resource for millions of people across the United States committed to praying for our nation. If you have benefited from IFA's resources and community, please consider joining us as a monthly support partner. As a 501(c)3 organization, it's through your support that all this possible.


We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. Privacy Policy
Comments
Father God, expose the ones either in this country abroad who funded this bloodshed and bring them to justice even if they get taken off the face of the earth. Your judgements are faithful and true and you wish none should perishbut Gid you defend Israel and the United States from demonic forces hell bent for Hells victory when Your Son defeated them at Calvary and HE ALONE HAS THE VICTORY in Jesus Holy Name Amen
Thank You, God, for letting a light be shined into these actions. Bless the courts and legal representatives that tenaciously pursued truth & justice in this situation. Please continue to raise up good men & women to continue to fight to correct all the injustices that have been done by misusing laws & government entities. We trust You and know that Your ways are always bestā¦including protecting the rights that You have endowed upon us all.
In Jesusā holy & mighty name, Amen.
Praise Ye the Lord!
Finally the Constitution and its First Amendment are being upheld!