The court now “expects the government to provide complete and accurate information in every filing,” she wrote.

Horowitz’s report, released last week, identified at least 17 “significant inaccuracies and omissions” in the application and renewals for Page’s FISA warrant.

While some media outlets highlighted Horowitz’s conclusion that there was no political bias at play during the FBI’s launch of the FISA application process to surveil Page, he criticized the FBI’s “entire chain of command” for fits failures during Senate Judiciary Committee hearing last week.

Later, Republican Senators pressed Horowitz on the role political bias could have played in the FBI’s securing of a FISA warrant to monitor Page. Eventually, Horowitz said he couldn’t exactly rule it out. . . .

Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) lambasted the FBI and Department of Justice over how it used the FISA courts, and he—along with other Republican senators—said changes in the FISA application process are warranted.

Horowitz’s report didn’t just show “a few irregularities,” he said. “What happened here is the system failed. People at the highest level of government took the law in their own hands.” Graham added of the media’s coverage of Horowitz’s investigation: “You clearly didn’t read it. If that’s your takeaway that this thing was lawfully predicated, and that’s the main point, you miss the entire report.”

Attorney General William Barr, President Trump, and U.S. Attorney John Durham, who is carrying out a related criminal investigation, have disputed Horowitz’s assertion there was no political bias or intentional misconduct in the FBI’s launch of the investigation.