BIRTH TOURISM PRODUCES 33,000 IMMEDIATE U.S. CITIZENS A YEAR
U.S. HOMELAND SECURITY PROPOSES FACE SCANS FOR U.S. CITIZENS
VIDEO: THE STORY BEHIND THE SONG I HAVE DECIDED TO FOLLOW JESUS
DAVID KUBAL: THERE WAS SPIRITUAL QUID PRO QUO
SEVEN SENATORS WHOSE VOTES MAY BE KEY IN IMPEACHMENT
BIRTH TOURISM PRODUCES 33,000 IMMEDIATE U.S. CITIZENS A YEAR
Foreign tourists to the U.S. give birth to 33,000 babies a year — each of them immediately becoming a citizen — according to a new report being released Thursday that puts numbers on the extent to which immigrants make use of America’s birthright citizenship policy.
Almost all of those 33,000 are part of birth tourism, says Steven A. Camarota, the researcher at the Center for Immigration Studies who did the report. That means they came to the U.S. while pregnant on short-term visas for the express purpose of giving birth and earning their child immediate citizenship.
Some 39,000 other foreigner women here on temporary student or guest-worker visas also give birth, Mr. Camarota calculated.
And that’s all in addition to nearly 300,000 births each year to illegal immigrants, each of which is also immediately a citizen, a status that provides to the parents a potential pathway, albeit complicated and lengthy, to remain legally in the U.S. as well.
“When we think about the issue of birthright citizenship or automatic citizenship we don’t usually think about all the temporary visitors. We usually think about the illegal immigrants,” he said. “But these are not trivial numbers, if you’re looking at around 70,000.”
The report comes amid intense interest on the part of President Trump in curtailing birthright citizenship.
He has suggested he could even try it through executive action — though most legal analysts say that’s beyond his presidential powers and it would take a law approved by Congress, and perhaps an actual change to the Constitution itself.
The Center for Immigration Studies said it hasn’t taken a stand on those legal questions, but did want to put numbers on the extent of the situation.
Under current policy, nearly every child born on U.S. soil is granted citizenship. The major exception is children born to foreign diplomats, who are not deemed under the jurisdiction of the U.S., and therefore are not automatically citizens.
Given the prized nature of American citizenship around the globe, the policy has created perverse incentives.
Federal authorities earlier this year announced criminal charges against 19 people accused of running “birth tourism” operations in Southern California, helping thousands of pregnant Chinese women reach the U.S. in time to give birth.
Women were charged up to $100,000, were coached on how to get visas and how to conceal their pregnancies from consular officials and border officers, then kept in apartments here for the final months of their pregnancies so they could deliver on U.S. soil and trigger the automatic citizenship policy.
One of the 19 pleaded guilty in September to her role. Her operation, You Win USA Vacation Services Corp., was responsible for 500 birth tourists, and she collected $3 million in fees over two years. She is to be sentenced next week.
While organizers of birth tourism can be prosecuted, U.S. immigration officials tell The Washington Times there is little they can do about the women unless they lied on their visa applications. And even then, authorities don’t pursue those cases.
As for the children themselves, once they have citizenship, it’s not revoked.
In addition to China, Russia is another major source of birth tourism.
“The people who do this typically are wealthy people or people of some means who live in a society where they fear instability, and this is a type of insurance policy,” Mr. Camarota said.
His numbers are based on calculations from census data. He said the 33,000 births to tourists is an “educated guess,” while the 39,000 births to women here on longer-term visas such as guest-worker programs is more definite.
Mr. Trump as recently as August said he’s “seriously” pondering action on the issue.
(Excerpt from The Washington Times. Article by Stephen Dinan.)
Partner with Us
Intercessors for America is the trusted resource for millions of people across the United States committed to praying for our nation. If you have benefited from IFA's resources and community, please consider joining us as a monthly support partner. As a 501(c)3 organization, it's through your support that all this possible.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. Privacy Policy
Comments
I agree. I have read our Constitution a number of times. Why, exactly, does the author say eliminating birth-citizenship could require a change to the Constitution? What phrase does he/she think would need changed?
I have to question the foundation of the whole article. We were taught that being born on US soil makes one a citizen, but is it true or just presumed? https://townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/2018/10/31/the-true-history-of-millstone-babies-n2533765 I wonder…