SUPREME COURT BLOCKS ENFORCEMENT OF NY RESTRICTIONS ON RELIGIOUS GATHERINGS
4,243 Views
Comments (7)
Share (56)
Print
METAXAS INTERVIEW: WHO IS ERIC COOMER?
JUDGE RULES IT’S UNCONSTITUTIONAL FOR GOVT TO GUIDE COVERAGE OF TAXPAYER...
A NEW DEVELOPMENT IN PA VOTE
THE KEY TO PRO-LIFE & RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
SUPREME COURT BLOCKS ENFORCEMENT OF NY RESTRICTIONS ON RELIGIOUS GATHERINGS
4,243 Views
Comments (7)
Share (56)
Print
I Prayed
have prayed
The recent confirmation of President Trump-appointed Justice Amy Coney Barrett has resulted in its first significant Supreme Court outcome, and it relates to the first protected liberty specified in the Bill of Rights: the free exercise of religion.
In a 5-4 ruling late Wednesday night, the Supreme Court backed a religious challenge to Democratic New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s restrictions limiting attendance at religious services. The majority ruling blocks enforcement of the restrictions while the applicants pursue appellate review. The ruling highlights the lack of evidence that the applicants — the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, two Jewish synagogues, and an Orthodox Jewish organization — have contributed to the spread of the virus and questions the rationale of the specifics of Cuomo’s restrictions, which limited services to just 10 and 25 occupants for red and orange zones, respectively.
“Not only is there no evidence that the applicants have contributed to the spread of COVID–19 but there are many other less restrictive rules that could be adopted to minimize the risk to those attending religious services,” the decision reads. “Among other things, the maximum attendance at a religious service could be tied to the size of the church or synagogue. Almost all of the 26 Diocese churches immediately affected by the Executive Order can seat at least 500 people, about 14 can accommodate at least 700, and 2 can seat over 1,000. Similarly, Agudath Israel of Kew Garden Hills can seat up to 400. . . .
“Members of this Court are not public health experts, and we should respect the judgment of those with special expertise and responsibility in this area,” the ruling asserts. “But even in a pandemic, the Constitution cannot be put away and forgotten. The restrictions at issue here, by effectively barring many from attending religious services, strike at the very heart of the First Amendment’s guarantee of religious liberty. Before allowing this to occur, we have a duty to conduct a serious examination of the need for such a drastic measure.”
“The applicants have made the showing needed to obtain relief, and there is no reason why they should bear the risk of suffering further irreparable harm in the event of another reclassification,” the ruling concludes. “For these reasons, we hold that enforcement of the Governor’s severe restrictions on the applicants’ religious services must be enjoined.”
In his concurring opinion, Justice Neil Gorsuch, the first of Trump’s three Supreme Court appointments, writes, “Government is not free to disregard the First Amendment in times of crisis. At a minimum, that Amendment prohibits government officials from treating religious exercises worse than comparable secular activities, unless they are pursuing a compelling interest and using the least restrictive means available. … Yet recently, during the COVID pandemic, certain States seem to have ignored these long-settled principles. Today’s case supplies just the latest example.”
“It is time — past time — to make plain that, while the pandemic poses many grave challenges, there is no world in which the Constitution tolerates color-coded executive edicts that reopen liquor stores and bike shops but shutter churches, synagogues and mosques,” he concludes.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Trump’s second appointee, concurs, concluding: “On this record, the applicants have shown: a likelihood that the Court would grant certiorari and reverse; irreparable harm; and that the equities favor injunctive relief. I therefore vote to grant the applications for temporary injunctive relief until the Court of Appeals in December, and then this Court as appropriate, can more fully consider the merits.” . . .
The majority ruling rejects Roberts’ and the three liberal judges’ argument that the matter is moot because the circumstances have changed, contending: “The dissenting opinions argue that we should withhold relief because the relevant circumstances have now changed. After the applicants asked this Court for relief, the Governor reclassified the areas in question from orange to yellow, and this change means that the applicants may hold services at 50% of their maximum occupancy. The dissents would deny relief at this time but allow the Diocese and Agudath Israel to renew their requests if this recent reclassification is reversed. There is no justification for that proposed course of action. It is clear that this matter is not moot.”
As noted by The New York Times, Supreme Court’s ruling is “at odds” with its previous rulings concerning church attendance restrictions in California and Nevada, delivered in May and July, respectively, in which the court declined to back similar challenges. Justice Barrett was confirmed by the Senate on Oct. 26 in a 52-48 vote.
(Excerpt from The Daily Wire. Article by John Bickley. Photo Credit: Getty Images.)
Share your prayers of praise in the comments below!
Comments (7)
Share (56)
Post A Prayer
Print
I Prayed
have prayed
Post A Prayer
Related Content
Senate Chaplain Credits God for His Healing
I Prayed
Teacher Wins $450K in Pronoun Dispute Lawsuit
I Prayed
Partner with Us
Intercessors for America is the trusted resource for millions of people across the United States committed to praying for our nation. If you have benefited from IFA's resources and community, please consider joining us as a monthly support partner. As a 501(c)3 organization, it's through your support that all this possible.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. Privacy Policy
Comments
Though I certainly praise God for the ruling, it continues to show the divisiveness of the court and Kavanah left the door open for a superseding ruling. Why cannot they make a final ruling? Another skirmish has been won but it seems that the battle is not over. Let us continue to pray for unity and solidarity on the court to uphold the constitution and make final that decision.
Lord we thank you for this ruling. Continue to give wisdom, courage and strength to those serving on the SC. May you guide their duties in a way that they honor the Constitution and the word of God. Help them to not decide or make ruling decisions that rely only on their own intellect but instead, the laws that are already established that honor your word Lord.
Praise God! Holy spirit, please be preparing SCOTUS for the next big thing. The entire voter fraud mess needs to be dealt with in an honest and fair fashion. We thank you and praise You that the Supreme court is in a position to vote for this overturning of the “election’. We pray for the results to be in favor of President Trump. Our nation so desperately needs for him to continue to be our President. In Jesus’s name we pray.
I say and sing a resounding HALLELUJAH!🤗
Our God still sits on the throne. He is our creator, the creator of all things good. Justice shall prevail above man’s ill conceived mandates!
I pray and beg that every Christian will attend Church on Christmas to welcome our Lord back into our hearts. Please try to attend as a family.
Praise the Lord. Thank you Father. Thank you Jesus. You alone are God, faithful and true. You fight our battles and do not leave us desolate. Thank you for this ruling that allows us to gather in worship to the glory of Your Most Holy Name. May the good work You have started be completed until the day of Christ in Jesus name Amen.