SEIZING A HISTORIC OPPORTUNITY
785 Views
Comments (3)
Share
Print
SEIZING A HISTORIC OPPORTUNITY
785 Views
Comments (3)
Share
Print
I Prayed
have prayed
Wisdom is a shelter as money is a shelter, but the advantage of knowledge is this: that wisdom preserves the life of its possessor. (Eccl. 7:12)
“No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we’ll ever see on this earth!”
— Ronald Reagan
President Trump presents his first budget to Congress on Thursday. It is, as The Washington Post points out, “historic” because if adopted, it would be the biggest contraction in the federal government since the end of World War II. Predictably, a Post story focuses on the number of federal workers it estimates could lose their jobs, rather than on whether those jobs and the programs associated with them are necessary.
The biggest drivers of debt remain entitlement programs and true to his campaign promise, the president is not touching those, at least for now. His challenge will be to ask Congress to eliminate failed programs, because too many members rely on campaign contributions from lobbyists with an interest in maintaining the status quo.
Some federal agencies have long practiced a policy of telling employees to find ways to spend leftover money at the end of a fiscal year for fear their budgets might be reduced. The practice is a contributing factor to government’s seemingly unstoppable growth.
While most proposals for cutting the size and cost of government tinker with spending at the edges while ignoring the main drivers of debt, a beginning can be made. If Republicans start with failed programs and present them as failures that waste taxpayer money, the public might come to trust them when it comes to the bigger things.
Patrick Louis Knudsen, a consultant and visiting fellow at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank based in Washington, D.C., has authored a plan he says can save $42 billion just by eliminating bad government programs and initiating spending reductions in others that may still serve necessary functions.
Knudsen’s recommendations, made in 2013, do not take into account projected savings from changes in Obamacare, but they are a good beginning. Many programs could be managed as well, or better and at lower costs, by the private sector.
The U.S. government, notes Mr. Knudsen, contributes money to many international organizations, which could easily be financed by private capital, if anyone is interested in them. These include the International Coffee Organization, the International Copper Study Group, the International Cotton Advisory Committee, the International Grains Council, and my personal favorite, the International Lead and Zinc Study Group.
There are 18 Energy Department programs Mr. Knudsen says could be turned over to the private sector.
Familiar targets include privatizing Amtrak and eliminating all subsidies for the Public Broadcasting Service, which once served a valuable cultural purpose, but is today in an age of multiple TV choices as outdated as a VHS tape.
Space precludes naming more programs that could be cut, but visit Heritage.org and search for Mr. Knudsen’s report, which lists them all.
Cutting the size and cost of government is doable if the reductions are properly and skillfully presented to the public. Predictably, Democrats will howl about starving children because they always do, even when Republican proposals merely target the rate of spending increases without ever getting to real cuts.
Is there enough of our Puritan DNA left to eliminate waste? We’re about to find out. If a government headed by Republicans can’t, or won’t, live up to their philosophy of smaller government and more personal freedom, why do we need them? If unnecessary spending and needed entitlement reforms are not accomplished by Republicans, the spending will continue and the debt will grow until the inevitable economic collapse. (Contributor: By Cal Thomas for The Washington Times – Cal Thomas is a nationally syndicated columnist. His latest book is “What Works: Common Sense Solutions for a Stronger America” (Zondervan, 2014).)
Free Download: America First – A Budget Blueprint to Make America Great Again
Comments (3)
Share
Post A Prayer
Print
I Prayed
have prayed
Post A Prayer
Related Content
Daily Prayer for America — May 9, 2024
I Prayed
How Soros Funded the Campus Protests
I Prayed
Partner with Us
Intercessors for America is the trusted resource for millions of people across the United States committed to praying for our nation. If you have benefited from IFA's resources and community, please consider joining us as a monthly support partner. As a 501(c)3 organization, it's through your support that all this possible.
Comments
I, too, am happy to see that the President is working on downsizing the budget, and shaping government spending into something manageable. However, one thing I would like to stop hearing is that Social Security and MediCare are “entitlements.” The word “entitlements” does not always mean people getting something for free. In fact, one of the definitions of “entitlement” is “the fact of having a right to something.” And, “the amount to which a person has a right.” Lastly, in the US, the term relates to ” government program that provides benefits to any individual meeting certain eligibility requirements.” I worked from my teens forward, and paid into a system (Social Security). I am now collecting that “to which I have a right,” because I paid into it for many years. Medicare cannot be considered the same as Medicaid/Medical. Many people are like me–they worked for what they are now receiving in the way of Social Security and MediCare benefits. And, by the way, MediCare is not free, other than Part A. We pay for everything over and above that coverage. So, please keep that in mind when talking about cutting benefits for your older US Citizens. Thank you for the article, and I continue to pray for our President.
reducing the size of the federal government is long overdue. many of these employees can and I am sure will work outside the government. a great first step in bringing government spending under control. next are the two major entitlement programs. the President must work to find a way to controlsocial security and medicare/medicaid
I am so pleased that we finally have a president that is willing and able to cut federal programs and spending. I have voted for someone to do that for at least 25 years. I am so excited that it is finally happening!! Thank you for this well written article.