Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers Under Fire Again
The Ongoing Border Crisis: What the Media Wonāt Tell You
PRICES AND INFLATION CLIMB
BIDEN NOMINEEāS DISTURBING STATEMENT ABOUT OIL, COAL, AND GAS
OHIO GOP REDISTRICTING PLAN WILL SQUEEZE OUT JIM JORDAN
Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers Under Fire Again
Another state is taking aim at the free speech of pro-life pregnancy care centers. You might remember the NIFLA Supreme Court victory in 2018 against a California law that aimed to compel centers to advertise for abortion providers. Well now a state on the East Coast is holding a sword over such groups based on their ādeceptive advertising.ā And at least one pro-life ministry is now taking that state to court.
With the help of Alliance Defending Freedom, Care Netās center in New London, Connecticut, filed a federal lawsuit this month against a state law billed by its supporters in the Nutmeg State as a truth-in-advertising statute. But pro-lifers see it as a sword to intimidate and punish them.
The State of Connecticut adopted this law earlier this year purportedly to curtail what its proponents view as misleading information from pregnancy centers āwhether by statement or omission.ā The statute arms the state with the ability to enforce corrective action and civil financial penalties against such messaging.
The legislation was labelled, āAn Act Concerning Deceptive Advertising Practices of Limited Services Pregnancy Centers.ā That is a pretty bold title, particularly when you consider that the target ā ālimited servicesā centers ā are specifically defined by the bill as entities that donāt ādirectly provide, or provide referrals for, abortions or emergency contraception.ā
In other words, the message to pro-lifers isā¦ we mean you. To reigning authorities in Connecticut commitment to abortion is apparently the ultimate standard by which your pregnancy care services will be judged.
While the bill was being considered in Hartford, Mary Szoch of the Family Research Council testified that this legislation was āan attempt to silence Connecticut’s pro-life pregnancy centers, in violation of their First Amendment rights.ā She said that unlike numerous truth-in-advertising federal and state statutes that apply generally to all organizations, this bill was different because āit deliberatelyāand unjustlyāsingles out pro-life pregnancy centers.ā
To emphasize her point, Szoch added:
Nothing in the bill prevents abortion practices from engaging in deceptive advertising practices. For example, Planned Parenthoodāwhose very name implies that a pregnant woman visiting the clinic will receive balanced information regarding the resources available to her if she would like to parentāis not obligated in any way to clarify in their advertising that their core mission is expanding abortion.Ā Pro-life pregnancy centers are targeted for one reason onlyāto stifle their speech.
That understanding makes it all the more worrisome when Connecticut Attorney General William Tong, whose office is now empowered to act against pro-life centers, praised the bill. Tong, a āchampionā in the eyes of Planned Parenthood, said, āPregnant women seeking information about their reproductive health choices deserve accurate, timely answersā¦. my office is prepared to use its authority under this law to protect the rights and health of women.ā
Notably, ADFās lawsuit on behalf of Care Net highlights that Tong had previously given examples of what deceptive advertising might include. āTong answered that the statement, āAre you pregnant? Need help with your pregnancy? Do you want abortion-related counseling?ā is a āpretty clearā example,ā the ADFās formal complaint says. The filing also suggests Tong took aim at white coats worn by pregnancy center staff, even though, as ADF explains, Care Net and other pregnancy centers do in fact employ medical professionals and provide health services.
After filing the case, ADF attorney Denise Harle said, āThis law allows the state attorney general to decide if he likes what youāre saying, and if he doesnāt, you must ācorrectā it or be punished.ā
She added, āThe Supreme Court has made it clear that the government canāt target certain messages because it doesnāt like a particular viewpoint. Care Net should have the freedom to continue serving women in southeastern Connecticut without government censorship.ā
Will you pray for this new case attempting to defend pro-life pregnancy centers from yet another attack by allies of the abortion industry?
Aaron Mercer is a Contributing Writer with two decades of experience in Washington, D.C.ās public policy arena. Photo by Ben White on Unsplash.Ā
Partner with Us
Intercessors for America is the trusted resource for millions of people across the United States committed to praying for our nation. If you have benefited from IFA's resources and community, please consider joining us as a monthly support partner. As a 501(c)3 organization, it's through your support that all this possible.


We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. Privacy Policy
Comments
Thank you for keeping us informed about this attack on free speech which impacts the lives of preborn children. May God grant AG Tong repentance leading to a knowledge of the Truth.
Yes Lord I pray for your protection over this pregnancy center, to be able to continue to have the freedom to say what is true to the women who are searching for an answer. Please Holy Spirit be in charge of this situation and let this action against this pregnancy center fail. Thank you for working in this. Your will be done Lord.