Pres. Trump Asks Supreme Court to Delay TikTok Ban Enforcement
Trump’s Opportunity to Bring Balance to White House Press Room
Anglican Group Claims the Bible ‘Affirms’ Transgenderism
6 States Took Action Against DEI in Education in 2024
2024: A Year in Revival
Pres. Trump Asks Supreme Court to Delay TikTok Ban Enforcement
As the deadline for TikTok’s divestment draws closer, the app may have found an unlikely ally in the incoming President.
(The Center Square) – President-elect Donald Trump has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to delay the enforcement of the federal law that would mandate the sale or shutdown of TikTok by Jan. 19, 2025, the day before his inauguration.
Join others crying out to the Lord day and night.
In a brief filed on Dec. 27, 2025, Trump’s legal team requested a postponement to allow his incoming administration to address the national security concerns through “political negotiations” rather than an outright ban.
“President Trump takes no position on the merits of the dispute,” said Trump’s amicus brief, written by D. John Sauer. “Instead, he respectfully requests that the Court consider staying the Act’s deadline for divestment of January 19, 2025, while it considers the merits of this case.”
The law, signed in April by President Joe Biden, mandates that TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance, sell by Jan. 19, 2025, or face a nationwide ban, citing national security and content manipulation concerns.
Trump’s brief emphasizes his opposition to banning the platform, highlighting its user base of 170 million Americans and small businesses and its role in free expression. He also argues that political resolutions could address the security concerns without a ban through the administration’s “dealmaking expertise.”
The Supreme Court agreed to hear TikTok’s arguments on Jan. 10 on whether the law is unconstitutional and violates the First Amendment rights of the 170 million Americans who use the social media platform.
TikTok said it was pleased with the Supreme Court order and believed the court would find the TikTok ban unconstitutional.
The brief states, “…these unique features of the Act raise significant concerns about possible legislative encroachment upon the President’s prerogative to manage the Nation’s geopolitical, strategic relationships overall, and with one of our most significant counterparts, China, specifically.”
The platform has continued to say that the ban infringes upon free speech rights, while the Biden administration maintains that the measure is necessary to protect national security.
This news comes amid an ongoing debate about balancing national security with free speech in the digital age.
Trump initially supported a ban during his first term, citing national security concerns, before using the platform to connect with younger voters, saying, “If you like TikTok, go out and vote for Trump.”
The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how the U.S. government regulates foreign-owned technology platforms operating domestically.
What do you think of President Trump’s opinion on TikTok? Share your thoughts and prayers below.
This article was originally published at The Center Square. Used with permission. Photo Credit: Solen Feyissa on Unsplash.
Partner with Us
Intercessors for America is the trusted resource for millions of people across the United States committed to praying for our nation. If you have benefited from IFA's resources and community, please consider joining us as a monthly support partner. As a 501(c)3 organization, it's through your support that all this possible.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. Privacy Policy
Comments
Initially, this bothers me tremendously. I believe much should be done to remove TikTok and the bad influence on our young people. President Trump needs to remove China’s influence on our young people. This is not a freedom of speech of Americans. It is freedom from China’s influence on our younger population.
May the courts have your wisdom.
To me, if a foreign platform in America can offer “Free Speech” to surveil information from America’s children and adults, then USA should be allowed a platform in China, for “Free Speech” for China’s citizens. No other way would be fair, or the ban should go on.
[email protected]
I am disappointed in DJT’s push in this matter. I seem to recall that he has a personal and political l interest. I’m also disappointed in Mrs Trump’s pro-choice stance. I will be in 🙏 about both.
Agreed. Praying as well.