Over 250 FBI Agents Were at the Capitol on Jan. 6
3,432 Views
Comments (13)
Share (13)
Print
Want a Shutdown? We’ll Put DOGE Into Overdrive, White House Says
Poll: Majority Concerned About Political Violence in America
AI Chatbots Are Putting Children in Danger
Report: Abortion Pill Is More Dangerous Than Previously Thought
Over 250 FBI Agents Were at the Capitol on Jan. 6
3,432 Views
Comments (13)
Share (13)
Print
I Prayed
have prayed
According to a recent report, over 250 plainclothes FBI agents were deployed to the Capitol on January 6, 2021. Many of those same agents later complained about how politicized the bureau had become.
Get prayer updates from IFA.
From Just the News:
The FBI secretly deployed more than 250 plainclothes agents to the U.S. Capitol during the Jan. 6, 2021 riot, an operation so disorganized it unleashed searing frustrations among many of the FBI’s rank-and-file that the bureau had lost its core competencies to “wokeness” and allowed its employees to become “pawns in a political war,” according to an after-action report kept from the public for more than four years.
Scores of FBI agents and personnel – many from the bureau’s premier Washington field office (WFO) – sent anonymous complaints to the after-action team detailing how agents were sent into an unsafe scenario without proper safety equipment or the ability to identify themselves readily as armed officers to other police agencies, the report obtained by Just the News shows.
The most persistent complaint was that the bureau during the James Comey and Chris Wray era had become infected with political biases and liberal ideology that treated the protesters from the summer 2020 Black Lives Matter riots far differently than those arrested in the aftermath of the Jan. 6 episode.
According to the after-action report penned by the agents, which you can read here, 274 plainclothes agents were deployed to the Capitol after violence started. The report also revealed that many of the agents in the FBI at the time were concerned with political bias within the bureau. One agent wrote, “Our response to the Capitol Riot reeks of political bias,” while another wrote, “We have been used as pawns in a political war.”
The report directly contradicts former FBI Director Christopher Wray’s 2023 testimony before Congress, in which he vehemently rejected the notion of bias in the FBI. Just the News notes it could also help some remaining Jan. 6 court cases, since agents who “were witnesses at the Capitol and did not disclose it in the subsequent affidavits during prosecutions … could create grounds for defendants to appeal.”
For years, the government has lied to us about the events that took place on Jan. 6. Now, however, we seem to finally be getting the truth. Let’s continue to pray for transparency and justice!
Share your prayers for truth and justice below.
(Excerpt from Just the News. Photo Credit: Colin Lloyd on Unsplash)
Comments (13)
Share (13)
Post A Prayer
Print
I Prayed
have prayed
Post A Prayer
Related Content
Pray About Today’s “No Kings” Protests!
I Prayed
Grand Jury Indicts Bolton Over Mishandling of Classified Info
I Prayed
Partner with Us
Intercessors for America is the trusted resource for millions of people across the United States committed to praying for our nation. If you have benefited from IFA's resources and community, please consider joining us as a monthly support partner. As a 501(c)3 organization, it's through your support that all this possible.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. Privacy Policy
Comments
The linked report, assuming it was the same one submitted to a House Committee, does NOT say that 250 agents were involved.
As with the posting about the Gates Foundation, the ‘link’ which supposedly makes it look like there is evidence, all but disproves the claim.
I want to make a clarification. In the posting by IFA, statements from the FBI, which were not necessarily made in relationship to the capitol riot, are linked in such a way as to imply that the FBI agents at the capitol were given orders which would cause them to contribute to the atmosphere of political violence (claims that they were political pawns and such). The overall impression from the report is that the agents who were there did not know what their orders were and complained that they were not given riot equipment for protection. We know that there were some FBI agents there. That was established some time ago. To prove that hundreds of FBI agents were at the capitol and that they had orders to urge the crowd to violence would take more than what is provided which would be evidence tied directly to that event. You would have to have photographic evidence of those orders which showed they were ordered to contribute to the violence and sworn testimony under oath from the hundreds of FBI agents which they claim were there as to what they did and what they thought their orders were.
There is much to be uncovered about that. Why did Christopher Wray send agents to the capital and then deny it? I pray the truth would come out and we would know why.
Holy Spirit, let Truth be known and proclaimed in our nation!
In Jesus mighty Name! So be it!
Anyone who wants to see the truth should give a look at the report that is available here as part of the presentation. Evidence is abundant in this article and other places too.
Thank you Lord for stirring the truths to come out.
The article references a report turned over to the House Judiciary Committee but we are not told the contents of the report or given any indication of the depth of the ‘proof’. The House Judiciary Committee is a political body and gets reports al the time which don’t pan out. As with all political claims, it has to be taken with a grain of salt. Afterall, Bondi claimed that she had Epstein reports on her desk and that she has seen ‘proof’ and then back tracked as to the level of proof.
This is a shocking claim, and all of the agents who might have been involved, if they were involved, should be on record being interviewed as to what they thought their orders were as well as photographs being provided which proved they were undercover and not identified as agents. There should be email evidence or documents proving what their orders were. There has to be some kind of physical evidence because of the number of agents they are claiming were involved. And, yes, there was some claim that there were agents there for crowd control but you have to prove the numbers as well as that they were there to stir up the crowd.
Investigative reporting is hard work. It can require months and certainly weeks of work. Take Tucker’s claim that Ukraine was selling American weapons to Mexican drug cartels. To prove that would probably require a team of reporters. You need one who is an expert on the drug cartel and one an expert on Ukraine and who has made themselves familiar with their weapons. It would require photographs of weapons with a backdrop which shows that they are clearly in Mexico and includes identifying information such as make and model and serial numbers. Tucker claimed half of weapons sold, so you would have to have at least over 60 photographs and perhaps hundreds. You would have to prove that the equipment shown was sold to Ukraine which would require photographs of records such as bank statements or receipts or other documents. Tucker made this claim and provided NO proof and made the claim from his studio so clearly not in Mexico. You need to stay away from that kind of reporting.
The referenced article supposedly quoted individuals who are not identified. Those kind of quotes prove nothing. They could be made up by a reporter. The person making the claim could have misidentified themselves. They could be made by an unreliable employee. Only quotes from individuals willing to be held accountable for their claims by identifying themselves and who can be proven to be in a position to know and/or are making sworn statements under oath count.
Luke 12:1-3 The Voice
Jesus: Guard yourselves from the yeast that puffs up the Pharisees—hypocrisy, false appearance, trying to look better than you really are. Nothing is covered up that won’t be discovered; nothing is hidden that won’t be exposed. Whatever a person says in the dark will be published in the light of day, and whatever a person whispers in private rooms will be broadcast from the housetops
Dear LORD, I believe Your Word. You tell us to guard ourselves from hypocrisy, false appearance and trying to look better than we really are. And on so many occasions, You said nothing hidden can remain that way….everything will be exposed. I pray Your truth will flow through every layer of our society, beginning in our homes. May Truth fill our churches, our schools, our government….everyone. But for the deceivers, please quickly expose and for those who speak truth, quickly justify. I pray You are bringing into the darkness, the “light of day.” I am believing this will come to be and I do so in the Name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Amen
Whenever a news source makes a shocking claim of this magnitude, they should spend a great deal of time proving it. So, where are the photographs of the agents at the Capital with cross referring pictures confirming their identify as agents?? We are taking about a lot of agents so where are those hundreds of pictures????? Where is the photographs of documents which confirm they were there??? Where are the interviews with the agents with them ever denying it or confirming it or saying ‘no comment’? In extreme and serious charges like this, it would be expected for the news source to confront as many of the agents as possible. Where are the statements by witnesses?? And, yes, it requires a lot of work, taking place over many months.
This is what happened with the claims of election fraud. Claims have to be proved.
talking
Please notice that “Just the News’ did not prove their claim. IFA needs to show greater discernment is what they post.