Praise the Lord that truth will prevail as the facts are now coming out and that justice will be served.

“Finally, brothers and sisters, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things.” (Phil 4:8)

View Comments (3)

The underlying theme promoted by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC), supported by the mainstream media, that there was collusion between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin to ensure a Hillary Clinton defeat, never made any strategic sense.

After all, why would Vladimir Putin want Donald Trump as president when he vowed to restore America’s greatness by not only rebuilding our military forces, including our nuclear forces, but also by restoring our border security, and revitalizing our economy and American exceptionalism?

Therefore, the false dossier had to be created to first destroy candidate Trump….

The facts are that the Kremlin basically owned Hillary Clinton. Aside from the Uranium One deal that brought $145 million to the Clinton Foundation, she was a totally compromised secretary of State by her use of a non-government, unsecured email server which Russia, China, Iran, North Korea and others likely hacked. Further, President Obama, using a pseudonym, repeatedly sent communications to Mrs. Clinton on this unsecured server. There is no question our enemies had a field day. Clearly, both the former president and secretary of State are guilty of violating the Espionage Act, a felony.

The Uranium One deal is a classic example of how Mr. Putin’s Russia compromised Hillary Clinton. The $145 million of contributions to the Clinton Foundation from members of the Uranium One board of directors was just a down payment.

Not only did Mr. Putin and his cronies compromise her, but based on the Feb. 7 testimony of undercover FBI informant Douglas Campbell provided to three congressional committees, the Russians most likely compromised FBI Director Robert Mueller and the U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland Rod Rosenstein for their failure to indict the Rosatom agent Vadim Mikerin on RICO charges in 2010, which would have killed the deal….

So the question is, why indict Russians when you can never bring them to justice since there is no extradition treaty between the U.S. and Russia? This is what I would call a “safe indictment,” which lets the DOJ, FBI and the media continue to perpetuate the Russia-gate collusion story to deflect the general public’s knowledge of the corruption of the DOJ/FBI use of the unverified Steele dossier to obtain FISA warrants….

The FISA court made a fundamental mistake, according to National Review’s Andy McCarthy, by accepting the unverified dossier based on the FBI vouching for the reliability of the MI-6 spy Steele…

The FISA warrants issued are, in effect, illegal….

The subject of the meeting was a report the president called for on “assessing Russian activities and intentions in recent U.S. Elections.” It was their view that Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election was inseparable from suspected Trump campaign collusion….

The plan apparently devised was that when FBI Director Comey briefed incoming-President Trump on Jan. 6 on the dossier, he only briefed him on the compromising sexual acts in the dossier, which Mr. Trump completely denied….

Had he been told that, there is no question Mr. Trump would have ordered the investigation shut down…. The bottom line is that the only one who would have been subject to blackmail by Russia’s Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton. (Excerpts from James A. Lyons article in The Washington Times)