Attack on SCOTUS? Leak Likely Came from Liberal Justice
State Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to Election Safeguards
Group Deceives Seniors and the Disabled into Running in Elections
5 Debunked Hoaxes Related to Donald Trump
Trump Survives Second Assassination Attempt
Attack on SCOTUS? Leak Likely Came from Liberal Justice
The Supreme Court has suffered another leak. This time, some are saying that the leak came from one of the court’s liberal justices.
From The Daily Caller. The latest leaks about the Supreme Courtās internal deliberations on three major cases involving former President Donald Trump could be coming from a high level member of the minority, former clerks and long time court observers told the Daily Caller News Foundation.
Have you taken your place on the wall?
Drawing on ādetails from the justicesā private memos, documentation of the proceedings and interviews with court insiders, both conservative and liberal,ā a SundayĀ reportĀ published by The New York Times offered a window into the the justicesā decision making process on three major cases, including Trump v. United States, where the Supreme CourtĀ held former presidents are immune from prosecution for official acts taken in office. The report mainly targets Chief Justice John Roberts, highlighting his efforts to secure a consensus on controversial cases. …
In a Feb. 22 memo from Roberts to his colleagues, which was obtained by the NYT, Roberts critiqued the lower court for failing to āgrapple with the most difficult questions altogetherā in Trumpās presidential immunity appeal. He argued they should take up the case. …
In Fischer v. United States, Roberts took over authoring the opinion he had initially assigned to Justice Samuel Alito, according to the NYT. …
In the Trump v. AndersonĀ case, which considered Coloradoās decision to remove Trump from the ballot, Roberts wanted to issue a unanimous, unsigned opinion. In the final opinion, he sided with conservative justices who wanted to find that only Congress can enforce the āinsurrectionist banā in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment …
South Texas College of Law Houston professor Josh BlackmanĀ argued in Reason that the New York Timesā report was āfar worse than the Dobbs leakā in 2022 …
Blackman wrote that he believes Justice Elena Kaganās absence from the reporting suggests she or her surrogates are behind the leaks.
āIf Kagan is willing to publicly undermine her colleagues in a speech at the Ninth Circuit, why would she do any less off-the-record?ā he wrote. …
Kagan publicly called for an enforcement mechanism for the Supreme Courtās ethics code in July,Ā suggestingĀ at the 9th Circuit judicial conference that lower court judges could enforce the code,Ā accordingĀ to CNN. Democrats have repeatedlyĀ calledĀ for an enforcement mechanism since the Supreme CourtĀ adopted a code of ethics last year. …
Share your prayers for the Supreme Court in the comments.
(Excerpt from The Daily Caller. Photo Credit:Ā Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Partner with Us
Intercessors for America is the trusted resource for millions of people across the United States committed to praying for our nation. If you have benefited from IFA's resources and community, please consider joining us as a monthly support partner. As a 501(c)3 organization, it's through your support that all this possible.


We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. Privacy Policy
Comments
Father, I pray for the protection of our Supreme Court and the justices. May they not fear to make righteous decisions. Draw each of them to you for salvation though Jesus Christ.
Are you demonizing the very people you are called to convert and disciple? What spirit are of them? Not Christ! What hard proof do you have?