I Prayed have prayed
Lord, we pray that You would protect our country and help it to hold its biblical values.
Reading Time: 2 minutes

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., kicked off the question-and-answer portion of Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmation hearing by zeroing in on her judicial philosophy, as well as comparisons to the late conservative icon Justice Antonin Scalia. . . .

“So in English, that means that I interpret the Constitution as a law, that I interpret its text as text, and I understand it to have the meaning that it had at the time people ratified it,” Barrett said. “So that meaning doesn’t change over time and it’s not up to me to update it or infuse my own policy views into it.”

Graham then referenced Scalia, for whom Barrett clerked early in her career, asking how she would react to being called a female version of Scalia.

“I would say that Justice Scalia was obviously a mentor, and as I said when I accepted the president’s nomination, that his philosophy is mine too,” Barrett said. “You know he was a very eloquent defender of originalism, and that was also true of textualism, which is the way that I approach statutes and their interpretation.” . . .

“I want to be careful to say that if I’m confirmed you would not be getting Justice Scalia, you would be getting Justice Barrett,” she said. “And that’s so because originalists don’t always agree, and neither do textualists.”

Barrett illustrated her point by referencing the disagreements Scalia had with Justice Clarence Thomas, which showed that originalism is “not a mechanical exercise.”

The originalist approach is usually supported by Republicans, who have warned against having judges who take a more activist approach to the law by interpreting it through an ideological lens. Barrett said that she is capable of putting her personal views aside and applying the law as it was written.

So may all Your enemies perish, O Eternal One! But may those who love You be like the sun, rising and going forth with power! (Judges 5:31)

God didn’t allow anyone to tyrannize them; He rebuked kings in order to protect His people:  “Do not lay a hand on My anointed people; do not do any harm to My prophets.” (Psalm 105: 14-15)

(Excerpt from Fox News. Article by Ronn Blitzer. Photo Credit: Getty Images.)

What did you think about Barrett’s explanation? Discuss in the comments!

Comments (3) Print

Comments

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Luanne
October 19, 2020

Abba, bring Justice Amy Barrett’s confirmation exponentially. In Jesus name, Amen.

18
Laura K
October 19, 2020

Lord, I believe Amy is Your person for this position and I ask that Your will is done in this confirmation, in Jesus name. Amen

28
Mary Lou Ryan
October 19, 2020

By the Word of the Lord and the Testimony of her life- God has appointed Judge Barrett to this position! God will have His way-
All to His glory!!

32

Partner with Us

Intercessors for America is the trusted resource for millions of people across the United States committed to praying for our nation. If you have benefited from IFA's resources and community, please consider joining us as a monthly support partner. As a 501(c)3 organization, it's through your support that all this possible.

Dave Kubal
IFA President
Become a Monthly Partner

Share

Click below to share this with others

Log in to Join the Conversation

Log in to your IFA account to start a discussion, comment, pray, and interact with our community.