I Prayed have prayed
Lord, we ask You to give the justices wisdom as they consider how to rule on this complex issue. We pray for justice and for Your will to be done.
Reading Time: 4 minutes

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in a case involving a taxpayer-funded religious school in Oklahoma. How will it rule on this key First Amendment issue?

From The Christian Post. The United States Supreme Court on Wednesday heard oral arguments on whether Oklahoma can allow the creation of a taxpayer-funded online Catholic charter school.

Have you taken your place on the wall?

 

The highest court in the landĀ heard argumentsĀ in the combined cases ofĀ Oklahoma Charter School Board, et al. v. Drummond, Attorney General of OklahomaĀ andĀ St. Isidore of Seville School v.Ā Drummond, Attorney General of Oklahoma.

At issue is whether the state can contract with two Catholic Church regional bodies to operate a taxpayer-funded online charter school known as St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett recused herself from the case. While she didn’t give an explanation,Ā The New York TimesĀ speculated that it had to do with Barrett being friends with Nicole Stelle Garnett, a professor who was an early adviser for St. Isidore.

Alliance Defending Freedom Chief Legal Counsel Jim Campbell argued on behalf of the charter school, saying in his opening remarks that ā€œwhen a state creates a public program and invites private actors, it can’t exclude people or groups because they’re religious.ā€

ā€œThe Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board is committed to this principle of religious neutrality,ā€ said Campbell. ā€œThat’s why it approved St. Isidore’s application based on the strength of its proposal, refusing to reject the group because of its faith.ā€

Campbell took issue with the claim that the proposed charter school was ā€œpart of the government,ā€ which the ADF attorney rejected, noting that it was ā€œprivately created by two Catholic organizations, and it is controlled by a privately selected board of directors.ā€

Justice Sonia Sotomayor asked a hypothetical about whether a charter school could, by the legal standard argued by Campbell, lawfully decide to no longer teach evolution in its science classes, compel students to attend mass or accept Catholic teaching.

Campbell responded that ā€œSt. Isidore allows exceptions for anyone that doesn’t want to attend massā€ and ā€œdoes not require students to affirm its religious beliefs.ā€

Regarding the other hypotheticals, Campbell said ā€œthe argument and the analysis would be different,ā€ as this case was focused on the question of there being ā€œany sectarian programming.ā€

Michael H. McGinley, an attorney representing St. Isidore’s, argued that the charter school was created by ā€œprivate actorsā€ and was therefore not a ā€œgovernment entityā€ to be held to the same standards as public schools.

Justice Elena Kagan asked McGinley about whether a Jewish Talmudic school that did little to teach state standards would have to be accepted by the charter school program by his reasoning.

McGinley replied that ā€œa state doesn’t have to open up an educational program to private organizationsā€ and that he was arguing that a state program cannot exclude a school solely because it is religious.

Gregory Garre represented Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond, who had filed a lawsuit against the state board for agreeing to greenlight the creation of the charter school.

Garre stated in his opening remarks that ā€œcharter schools are public schoolsā€ and thus have to be considered state actors that can be held to the same curricular standards as government schools.

ā€œTeaching religion as truth in public schools is not allowed,ā€ he said. ā€œSt. Isidore has made clear that that’s exactly what it wants to do in infusing its school day with the teachings of Jesus Christ.ā€

ā€œOklahoma respects and promotes through vouchers and other means the abilities of families to secure such an education in a private school.ā€

Garre emphasized the similarity between public schools and charter schools, including how Oklahoma’s charter schools and public schools, in accordance with state law, are both prohibited from teaching gender ideology or critical race theory.

Justice Samuel Alito asked about how charter schools are known to have more ā€œflexibilityā€ than public schools and to serve as a ā€œreal alternativeā€ to them for students.

Garre conceded this, but then countered by noting that charter schools are ā€œrigorously scrutinizedā€ from when they present an application to when they hold classes.

Alito noted that while charter schools must have a curriculum that ā€œhas to meet certain state requirements,ā€ their curriculum ā€œcan be quite differentā€ in its ā€œfocus.ā€

In June 2023, the Oklahoma Statewide Virtual Charter School BoardĀ voted 3-2Ā to approve the creation of St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School. The school would be jointly overseen by the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Oklahoma City and the Catholic Diocese of Tulsa.

However, progressive groups and Republican Attorney General Gentner Drummond objected to the charter school, with Drummond filing a complaint against the board in October 2023.

Progressive advocacy groups alsoĀ filed suit. Defendants named in the complaint included the Statewide Virtual Charter School Board, individual board members, the Oklahoma Department of Education, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Ryan Walters and Saint Isidore of Seville Virtual Charter School, Inc.

In June of last year, the Oklahoma Supreme CourtĀ ruled 7-1Ā against the religious charter school, with the majority deciding that the approval of the entity ran afoul of the state constitution.

Although the charter school board unanimously voted to rescind the contract for St. Isidore per an order from the state Supreme Court, they alsoĀ filed an appealĀ with the U.S. Supreme Court.

In January, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the combined cases ofĀ Oklahoma Charter School Board, et al. v. Drummond, Attorney General of OklahomaĀ andĀ St. Isidore of Seville School v.Ā Drummond, Attorney General of Oklahoma.

We prayed about this case earlier this week on Headline Prayer Live. You can view that webcast on our watch page, or in the embedded played below.

How are you praying for the Supreme Court? Share your prayers below.

This article was originally published at The Christian Post. Used with permission. Photo Credit: imenachi/Getty Images via Canva Teams.

Comments (2) Print

Comments

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Rose Rocha
May 2, 2025

God give wisdom to the Supreme Court of the USA. This law, if passed may open up doors for other so-called religious groups to get funding from the government. For example the Islamic, LGBTQ, Hindu + or church of Satan or whomever, claiming to be a church. Lord, may your will be done in this important case.

5
    Susan CC
    May 2, 2025

    Amen Rose, Amen! Thy will be done LORD as it is in Heaven…..

    2

Partner with Us

Intercessors for America is the trusted resource for millions of people across the United States committed to praying for our nation. If you have benefited from IFA's resources and community, please consider joining us as a monthly support partner. As a 501(c)3 organization, it's through your support that all this possible.

Dave Kubal
IFA President
Become a Monthly Partner

Share

Click below to share this with others

Log in to Join the Conversation

Log in to your IFA account to start a discussion, comment, pray, and interact with our community.