Pray for a restoration of voter confidence. Pray that our nation’s voter rolls will be purged of any illegal activities.

“Truthful lips endure forever, but a lying tongue lasts only a moment.“ (Prov. 12:19)                      

View Comments (3)

A federal judge on Monday rejected complaints that President Trump’s voter integrity commission was breaking the law by requesting and storing states’ voter data, saying that as long as the panel is just advisory, it doesn’t need to meet strict standards that would apply to government agencies.

The ruling was highly technical, but it clears the way for the commission to once again begin collecting data from willing states.

Commission Vice Chairman Kris W. Kobach welcomed the ruling and told The Washington Times that they’ll soon reach out to states to renew their request for information, which he had put on hold while the judge was deciding.

“Several states have already said they’re standing by ready to send in the publicly available voter rolls,” Mr. Kobach said.

Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly said that if the commission had continued to use an Army website to collect the information, as it originally envisioned, it might have run afoul of privacy laws. But because the commission switched gears and now plans to use a White House server, it escapes scrutiny, the judge said.

And even though one state, Arkansas, had already sent information to the Army website, it wasn’t enough to earn a spanking, the judge said.

Last week the judge also cleared the way for the commission to hold its first meeting, a ruling that says demands for disclosure of information must be “balanced against the interest of advisory commissions to engage in their work.”

Established by Mr. Trump to investigate voter fraud and barriers to voting that may have affected last year’s election, the commission has been controversial. Democrats have said there is no widespread evidence of fraud, and say an investigation is a waste of time and likely to be tainted by Mr. Trump.

A number of states have also balked at sharing their voter data with the commission — even though many of them make the same information available for purchase by campaigns, political parties, researchers or even the general public.

Mr. Kobach said his latest count is that about a dozen states are saying they’ll refuse, though he said some of them may reconsider. Meanwhile, more than 30 states have indicated they’ll cooperate to varying degrees.

He said some of those states have laws that do require payment for the information, and he said the commission will comply with those laws.

“Sometimes the left-leaning media was trying to spin that into a state saying no, and that’s not the case at all,” he said.

The Electronic Privacy Information Center had sued to try to derail the new commission, arguing that the panel hadn’t done a privacy assessment required under the E-Government Act before requesting the data….  (By Stephen Dinan for The Washington Times)