I Prayed have prayed
Lord, guide our nation's leaders with Your Spirit of discernment and truth. Help them to make wise decisions and be led by You.
Reading Time: 6 minutes

A massive new national project called “Educating for American Democracy” will be launched on Tuesday with the explicit aim of “redefining” and then “harmonizing” American civic education nationwide.

From the days of Thomas Jefferson, Noah Webster, Horace Mann, and the McGuffey readers to Ronald Reagan’s farewell address and the controversy over national history standards, citizenship education (broadly understood) has always been a vital function of American schools for the perpetuation of the American way of life. That’s about to change for the worse.

Educating for American Democracy (EAD) is a coalition of educators that aims “to transform teaching of civics and history to sustain our constitutional democracy and meet the needs of a diverse 21st century K-12 student body.”  . . .

Under a cooperative agreement with the federal agencies, iCivics will lead an EAD collaboration in partnership with four other organizations: Harvard’s Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics; Tufts’ Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE); Tufts’ Jonathan M. Tisch College of Civic Life; and Arizona State University’s School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership.

The core argument of EAD is, on the surface, a compelling one with widespread support.  . . .

EAD proclaims that its project “will require a sweeping national commitment that includes everyone, from educators to school and state administrators to local, state, and federal lawmakers, to parents. It will require a harmonized effort across all jurisdictions—local, tribal, state, and national—to ensure adoption.” (Bold in the original.) . . .

The project insists that “The Educating for American Democracy Roadmap demonstrates that an ideologically, demographically, and professionally diverse group agrees about content and pedagogy.”  . . .

Successor Ideology

While there are a few genuine conservatives and non-leftists (about 10) among the over 300 participants in Educating for American Democracy, the critical mass and thus the dominant and driving force within the project is overwhelmingly progressive.

Four of the five institutions involved in the project (iCivics, Harvard’s Center for Ethics, Tufts’ CIRCLE, and Tufts’ Tisch Center) are decidedly left of center. Right of center scholars on the executive committee are outnumbered 8-2. The same is true with the other task forces that developed the EAD Roadmap.  . . .

EAD wokeness manifests in its embrace of “equity.” We are told that “EAD teachers focus on inclusion and equity in both content and approach,” not on the traditional American concept of equality. Indeed, “equity” has come to mean a repudiation of the traditional principle of equality as enshrined in the Declaration of Independence and (as Shelby Steele recently discussed) in the original civil rights legislation.  . . .

Addressing Myriad Injustices

EAD rightfully notes that post-1960s historians have, to their credit, examined previously understudied histories of minorities and women. Yet it ignores the fact that contemporary historians have, to a large extent, presented America’s story through the crude lens of oppressor versus oppressed groups, thereby damaging the spirit of American citizenship.

For example, in September 2020, the Organization of American Historians (OAH) declared:

The best historical inquiry acknowledges and interrogates systems of oppression—racial, ethnic, gender, class—and openly addresses the myriad injustices that these systems have perpetuated. . . . Critical race theory provides a lens through which we can examine and understand systemic racism . . . .”

The prevailing mindset of the “Educating for American Democracy” project is clear enough. Louise Dubé, executive director of iCivics, told the American Enterprise Institute’s (AEI) Rick Hess that civic education “is undergoing a transformation in leadership and rethinking about how diversity and equity must be addressed.” Since the George Floyd protests, she notes, “it’s about realizing that we have been teaching civics primarily from one perspective, that of the white male.”

White male perspective? This is an artificial, meaningless category.  . . .

The current text of an EAD document laments that “students can make it into their teens without knowing, for instance, that George Washington was not only a foundational leader but also enslaved people.” Really? George Washington took people who were free and enslaved them? This is a blatant lie that apparently escaped the notice of the 300 or so educators involved in this project. Obviously, students should learn that Washington was a slaveholder who made provisions for freeing his slaves in his will while also providing for their economic and educational future as free individuals.

With a more than 96 percent majority among the participants and a 75 percent majority on the executive committee, it is not surprising that Educating for American Democracy has produced a left-wing product in tune with the latest theories of the wokerati. They prefer to denigrate George Washington as an active “enslaver,” rather than present him as a slave owner who wrote of slavery in 1786, “there is not a man living who wishes more sincerely than I do, to see a plan adopted for the abolition of it.”

Civic Participants

Educating for American Democracy degrades the meaning of American citizenship and the stirring oath of allegiance that naturalized citizens take to our Constitution by using the term “civic participant” to include anyone living in the United States, citizen or noncitizen, legal permanent resident or someone who just crossed the border illegally. EAD suggests that noncitizens as “civic participants” should be engaged in politics, policy, and public decision-making. In so doing, the “civic educators” of the EAD project reject and repudiate the very essence of American citizenship.

The EAD is not entirely devoid of positive content. There are references to the necessity of a “reflective” and “informed patriotism.”  . . .

But what role, if any, do conservatives and non-leftists play in the “Educating for American Democracy” project?

As noted, there are around 10 out of over 300 participants in the project that could be described as serious right-of-center scholars and practitioners. Of the five lead institutions in EAD, only one, Arizona State University’s School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership has a proven track record of comprehensive civic education that focuses on America’s founding principles and on the intellectual, economic, and cultural framework of the American regime.

Interestingly, EAD leaders made a great effort to recruit conservative scholars for the purpose of lending the project a façade of national credibility as a “cross-ideological” and “trans-partisan” initiative. (Frederick Hess of the American Enterprise Institute was particularly active on this score.) An EAD draft statement proudly announces: “We reached a consensus on a substantial educational vision.”  . . .

The Predominance of “Action Civics” 

In the final analysis, the end goal of the “Educating for American Democracy” project is to mandate “action civics” nationwide, (advocating “a sweeping national commitment”) particularly in red states. “Action civics” is sometimes called “new civics” and “project-based learning.”

The origins of action civics go back to the thinking of John Dewey and the progressive educators of the early 20th century. The theory is that students learn citizenship better by “doing civics” (participating in public policy and social action) than by learning book-based facts (studying about the separation of powers, federalism, and the like.)

Educating for American Democracy stipulates that students should both master the requisite civic knowledge and participate in civic action. . . .

Nevertheless, whatever assurances the leaders of EAD provide, action civics is (in practice) almost always ideologically biased in favor of the progressive Left. Students are trained to be activists in left-wing protests.  . . .

One can assume, with a fair degree of certainty, that “action civics” will not see students involved in pro-life and pro-gun rights protests or in projects supporting the hardworking, underpaid (often Latino) agents of the U.S. border patrol who risk their lives daily to enforce our nation’s laws. . . .

The Coming Civics Mandates

Stanley Kurtz of the Ethics and Public Policy Center has described in detail how “leftist action civics is already widespread in blue states and activists (and EAD) hope to force it onto deep-dyed red state school districts via statewide civics mandates.”

What will these state mandates look like?

EAD points to Illinois as an example of “best practices” and a model for the nation. What is Illinois doing? New state rules, called “Culturally Responsive Teaching and Leading Standards,” mandate that all teachers “assess how their biases . . . affect their teaching . . . how they access tools to mitigate their own behavior (racism, sexism, homophobia, unearned privilege, Eurocentrism, etc.)” Teachers are required to embrace the narrative of “systems of oppression . . . teachers . . . understand that there are systems in our society that create and reinforce inequities, thereby creating oppressive conditions.” Teachers must create “a risk-taking space that promotes student activism and advocacy.”  . . .

Stanley Kurtz has outlined how action civics and the EAD project would be implemented nationwide.

Under the guise of promoting long-neglected civic education, state legislatures would pass bills requiring courses in civics and history. At the direction of state boards of education, state curriculum specialists (overwhelmingly left-wing) would develop standards, curriculum, and rules that include mandatory teacher certification and licensing requirements “aligned with” the Roadmap of the “cross-ideological” EAD project.

In a fashion similar to the Obama Administration’s promotion of the “voluntary” Common Core agenda, the Biden Administration will claim the initiative is “optional” but use carrots (funding) and sticks (regulations) to promote action civics and the “latest” (meaning most woke) history and civics scholarship as de facto national mandates.

At the same time, left-wing private foundations would provide lavish funding to train teachers in understanding new forms of “civic engagement” including Ibram X. Kendi’s critical race theory.

Thus, traditional American citizenship education would be replaced by what the National Association of Scholars describes as the “anti-civics” mindset at the heart of “action civics.” . . .

What did you think of this article? Share in the comments below!

(Excerpt from American Greatness. Article by John Fonte. Photo Credit: Getty Images.)

Comments (10) Print

Comments

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

tammy S Kingery
March 5, 2021

Oh my goodness, did I read this wrong, I thought it meant to rid of common core, and get back to the basics of education from a Judea-Christian point of view. forgive me. We need Truth, back in our school systems, from our heritage of our founding fathers.

tammy S Kingery
March 5, 2021

Thank you, for the EAD curriculum, I pray this gets in all schools, and state testings.

Diana Hartsough
March 3, 2021

Traditional
Citizenship
Education Should Not Be Replaced!

2
Sharon Shepard
March 3, 2021

In agreement in prayer with Danny.

3
Danny N.C.
March 3, 2021

Dear Heavenly Father, protect our children and youths from the toxic lies and propaganda used by the left to indoctrinate and corrupt them. Lord I pray You confound their efforts to turn Americans against each other. Lord May we all have the wisdom, clarity, and moral courage to speak up against false teachings, and May we all plant the seeds of truth at every opportunity. Lord guide us and help us protect our most vulnerable children. In Jesus precious name I pray, Amen.

12
Susan CC
March 3, 2021

“Heavenly Father, we come before you today to ask Your forgiveness and to seek Your direction and guidance.
“We know Your word says, ‘Woe to those who call evil good, but that is exactly what we have done. We have lost our spiritual equilibrium and inverted our values.
“We confess that we have ridiculed the absolute truth of Your word in the name of ‘moral pluralism.’
“We have worshiped other gods and called it ‘multiculturalism.’
“We have endorsed perversion and called it ‘an alternative lifestyle.’
“We have exploited the poor and called it ‘a lottery.’
“We have neglected the needy and called it ‘self-preservation.’
“We have rewarded laziness and called it ‘welfare.’
“In the name of ‘choice,’ we have killed our unborn.
“In the name of ‘right to life,’ we have killed abortionists.
“We have neglected to discipline our children and called it ‘building esteem.’ “We have abused power and called it ‘political savvy.’
“We’ve coveted our neighbors’ possessions and called it ‘taxes.’
“We’ve polluted the air with profanity and pornography and called it ‘freedom
of expression.’
“We’ve ridiculed the time-honored values of our forefathers and called it
‘enlightenment.’
“Search us, oh God, and know our hearts today. Try us, and show us any wicked
in us. Cleanse us from every sin, and set us free.
“Guide and bless these men and women who have been sent here by the people
of the United States of America (Kansas) and who have been ordained by
You to govern this great country (state).
“Grant them Your wisdom to rule, and may their decisions direct us to the
center of Your will.
“I ask it in the name of your Son, the living Savior, Jesus Christ. Amen.”

Joe Wright’s Prayer Before The Kansas State Legislature on January 23, 1996

9
Curtis Guhl
March 3, 2021

Seeing the failure of higher education to uphold the values of previous generations ,this should be enough, to show how biblical character will be trampled under foot by programers. Since parents of biblical moral character don’t teach the Bible in our schools, redemption of humans though politics is a waste of time and money. Lord I pray we won’t have to go through this lesson.

6
Lois Tusant
March 3, 2021

Father, In the Name of your Mighty Son, Jesus, we ask that You forgive your people for being silent on the subject of education in America. We ask that you raise up Fathers in every home to counteract the poison in the schools with the truth of the Word of God. We ask you to raise up Gideons to take down the idols being raised in our schools. We ask for a move of Your Holy Spirit among the teachers and administrators in America. Have mercy on us and cleanse us from our idolatry!

8
Thomas Kukulski
March 3, 2021

Father forgive them for they know not what they do!!

13
SW
March 3, 2021

Heavenly Father, protect us from the demonic lies that this agenda is promoting. Wake up your people and mobilize your children to put a stop to this hateful indoctrination of our youth. I pray for courage among your people to take action in blocking this from our local school systems. In Jesus’ might name. Amen.

18

Partner with Us

Intercessors for America is the trusted resource for millions of people across the United States committed to praying for our nation. If you have benefited from IFA's resources and community, please consider joining us as a monthly support partner. As a 501(c)3 organization, it's through your support that all this possible.

Dave Kubal
IFA President
Become a Monthly Partner

Share

Click below to share this with others

Log in to Join the Conversation

Log in to your IFA account to start a discussion, comment, pray, and interact with our community.